The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has filed an appeal against the Federal High Court’s decision to proceed with his trial. Kanu seeks an order requiring the Federal Government to meet specific conditions before continuing the trial.
Kanu alleges that the Department of State Services (DSS) has repeatedly violated his rights by seizing his lawyers’ documents during visits, preventing his lawyers from taking notes, and eavesdropping on consultations. He claims these actions hinder his ability to adequately prepare his defense, violating Section 36(6)(b) of the 1999 Constitution.
On March 19, Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court rejected Kanu’s preliminary objection and denied his request for bail, ordering an accelerated hearing instead. Kanu’s appeal names the Federal Republic of Nigeria as the sole respondent, arguing that the lower court’s actions constitute a denial of his right to a fair trial.
Kanu contends that the trial court erred by assuming jurisdiction without ensuring his constitutional rights were protected. He emphasizes that the DSS’s actions deprived him of the necessary facilities to prepare his defense and access to his chosen counsel, resulting in a grave miscarriage of justice.
The appeal argues that the trial court neglected to protect Kanu’s rights, stating it lacked jurisdiction to proceed without ensuring these rights were upheld. Kanu requests that the appellate court either halt the trial until his rights are safeguarded or order an alternative custodial arrangement free from interference.
Kanu’s appeal seeks to vacate the lower court’s ruling, halt proceedings, and ensure his right to a fair hearing is respected, as enshrined in the constitution.
