Atiku Abubakar is attacking Nigeria’s electoral system and the judges only days after losing his Supreme Court case challenging the outcome of the 2023 presidential election.
He decried the court’s “unfortunate decision” to confirm Bola Tinubu’s proclamation as the winner of the February 25 election, as well as the role of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), at a news conference on Monday, October 30, 2023.
The Peoples Democratic Party’s (PDP) nominee stated that judges and election officials are “trapped in an evil web of political machination” since they are not selected on merit.
The former vice president detailed a number of improvements he would want to see implemented in order to enhance Nigeria’s electoral and judicial institutions.
Mandatory electronic voting and collation of results
“This is the 21st century and countries less advanced than Nigeria are doing so already. It is only bold initiatives that transform societies.”
Election petition must be concluded before winner is sworn in
“We must provide that all litigation arising from a disputed election must be concluded before the inauguration of a winner. This was the case in 1979. The current time frame between elections and the inauguration of winners is inadequate to dispense with election litigations. What we have currently is akin to asking thieves to keep their loot and use the same to defend themselves while the case of their robbery is being decided. It only encourages mandate banditry rather than discourages it.”
Winner must gain at least 50% of votes
“In order to ensure popular mandate and real representation, we must move to require a candidate for President to earn 50% +1 of the valid votes cast, failing which a run-off between the top two candidates will be held. Most countries that elect their presidents use this Two-Round System (with slight variations) rather than our current First-Past-the-Post system. Examples include France, Finland, Austria, Bulgaria, Portugal, Poland, Turkey and Russia, Argentina, Brazil, Ivory Coast, Sierra Leone, Namibia, Mozambique, Madagascar and even Liberia where a run-off is expected to hold in the coming days.”
Rotational single six-year term for president
“In order to reduce the desperation of incumbents and distractions from governing and also to promote equity and national unity, we need to move to a single six-year term for President to be rotated among the six geo-political zones. This will prevent the ganging up of two or more geo-political zones to alternate the presidency among themselves to the exclusion of other zones.”
INEC must verify credentials
“INEC should be mandated to verify the credentials submitted to it by candidates and their parties and where it is unable to do so — perhaps because the institutions involved did not respond in time — it must publicly state so and have it on record. A situation where a candidate submits contradictory credentials to INEC in different election cycles and the electoral umpire accepts them without question points to gross negligence, at best, or collusion to break the law by the leadership of the INEC, at worst.
“The submission of contradictory qualifying documents by a candidate as well as those found to be forged or falsified should disqualify a candidate even if the falsification or forgery is discovered after the person had been sworn into office. The burden of proving that a document submitted to INEC is forged should not be on the opposing candidates in the election. It is never the responsibility of an applicant for a job to prove that the person who eventually got the job did so with forged documents.”
The conduct of INEC, led by Prof. Mahmood Yakubu (left), in declaring Tinubu (right) the winner of the 2023 presidential election has been widely criticised [Kola Sulaimon/AFP]
INEC must stick by its guidelines
“The Electoral Act should be amended to provide that, except where they explicitly violate the Constitution and other laws, the rules and procedures laid down by the electoral umpire and made public for the benefit of the contestants and the voters will be treated as sacrosanct by the courts in deciding on election disputes.
“A referee cannot be allowed to set the rules for the game only to change or ignore them when one side has scored a goal or is about to win the match. We must restore confidence in our electoral system which the current leadership of INEC has completely eroded and undermined.”
More transparent judicial process
“We need well-thought out provisions in the legislation and regulations to reform the judiciary, including the introduction of an automated case assignment system; transparency in the appointment of judges; a practice directory that stresses that the goal of judges in election cases should be to discover and affirm voters’ choice rather than disregarding voters’ choice for the sake of technicalities.
“There should also be publicly available annual evaluation of the performance of judges using agreed criteria. By improving the transparency of the electoral process and reducing the incentives to cheat, in addition to transparency in the appointment of judges and other judicial reforms, the number of election petitions as well as corruption in the judiciary will be significantly reduced.
“More importantly, we would have succeeded in taking away the right to elect leaders from the courts and return it to the voters to whom it truly belongs.”
